Holy Spirit

Q/A Friday: Why Was It Advantageous for Jesus to Leave Earth?

Nevertheless, I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you” (John 16:7).

First, the Son’s departure came via the cross which was necessary for salvation. For the work of salvation to be complete, Christ had to leave this world. If He didn’t, His words on the cross, “It is finished” (John 19:30) would be a lie; nothing would be finished. His work would be incomplete and therefore salvation would not be attained for any of us. Read carefully how Paul states this truth in Galatians 4:4-6, “…God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons” (Galatians 4:4-5) Now watch this – after Christ’s adoption was complete. “And because you are sons, God has sent for the Spirit of His Son in to your hearts…” (Galatians 4:6). This sending of the Holy Spirit could only be done once the Son left the world after the work on the cross.

Second, the Holy Spirit can be in all places at all times; the Son – in human form – could only be in one place at one time. This is significant because the disciples would be scattered all over the world. They would not all be able to be with the Son for personal encouragement and guidance. However, the Holy Spirit can be everywhere, because He would be indwelling them.

Third, because of the Holy Spirit’s arrival, the disciples could now do greater works than Jesus (John 14:12). The word “greater” doesn’t mean “better”; it means “more extensive.” The ministry was to be “greater” in its extent or the number of people reached. For example, the ministry of the Son would go outside of Palestine which hadn’t taken place during Jesus’ life; that would not be the case with the disciples spreading the Gospel throughout the known world unto all nations (Acts 1:8). Their works would be greater in the number of conversions, further miracles and the recording of the N.T.

Fourth, if Son remained on earth in bodily form, there would have been no room for the exercise of the disciples’ faith. By the Son’s absence, the disciples would become twice the men they were called to become. In summary: they would grow in their faith by trusting what He said was true. In this time of waiting, their faith would increase.

If you have a question you would like to submit to our blog to be answered in the future, please email it to charlesheck@cox.net or post your question in the comments section.


What is Spirit Baptism? (Friday Q/A)

This is one of the more misunderstood ministries of the Holy Spirit and unfortunately the subject of some abuse as well. Some professing Christians tend to believe there is a series of baptisms that take place in the believer – one at salvation, one later when tongues is given, and even one when God empowers us for some task or duty, etc.

And granted, the Bible refers to different types of baptisms in the Bible – water baptism following salvation, baptism of the dead, Spirit-baptism, consecration to a task or role.

Others misunderstand this with indwelling or filling. Being filled with the Spirit can come and go, but baptism is a one-time event that needs not be repeated.

Let me give you a definition of the Spirit’s baptism and then we will consider a few verses. Spirit baptism is “an act which results in every believer becoming a member of the body of Christ and uniting us with Christ by identification with His death.” In other words, it is our placement into Christ at the moment of salvation that enables us to receive all the benefits of being part of the body of Christ. I Corinthians 12:12-13 says,

12 For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. 13 For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body – Jews or Greeks, slaves or free – and all were made to drink of one Spirit.”

In Bible interpretation, grammar matters. “Baptized” appears in what Greeks call the aorist tense. The aorist tense describes action occurring at one time and was not repeated. Thus, Paul says every Christian was baptized by the Spirit one time, and one time only.

John the Baptist recognized this – “I myself did not know him, but he who sent me to baptize with water said to me, ‘He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, this is he who baptizes with the Holy Spirit” (John 1:33).

Jesus told the disciplines before His ascension, “And while staying with them he ordered them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, he said, ‘you heard from me; or John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now’” (Acts 1:4-5).

Spirit baptism identifies us with Christ. And the outward baptism that we see modeled in churches as an ordinance is a visual symbol of that spiritual baptism taking place. But it doesn’t mean that the Spirit’s baptism doesn’t occur until we are physically baptized into the water. The Spirit’s baptism happens at salvation; physical baptism happens when the new believer chooses to obey Christ by entering the waters of baptism. By Spirit baptism, we are “officially in Christ.”

Let me give you a few characteristics of the Spirit’s baptism that will hopefully fill out the meaning just a bit more.

  • Spirit baptism is universal among believers of this age. There isn’t a single Christian alive today that has not been baptized by the Spirit and can now identifies themselves as being in Christ. (I Cor 12:13)
  • When the Holy Spirit falls on someone (e.g., Cornelius in Acts 10-11) that can be understood as Spirit baptism. It happens right at the moment of conversion.
  • Spirit baptism is non-experiential. This means you do not actually know when it happens. You just know that whenever that transfer of eternal destinies takes place, so does the Spirit’s baptism. Contrary to what some teach today, you are not slain or knocked over or feel warm fuzzies and that is indicative of the Spirit’s baptism. There is no biblical credence for such an interpretation of events.
  • Spirit baptism only happens at conversion. We know this for the aorist tense(s) mentioned before. We also know it because we are never commanded to be baptized by the Spirit – unlike being filled with the Spirit (Eph 5:18 – present tense).The Spirit’s baptism identifies as members of His body (I Cor 12:13), unified with Him and His church (Eph 4:3-6), and empowered to live the Christian life.

If you have a question you would like to submit to our blog to be answered in the future, please send them to charlesheck@cox.net or ask them in the comments section of this post.

A.W. Pink, on the Role of the Spirit in Bringing Conviction of Sin

The Sunday feature of the Worldly Saints blog is all about quotes. No commentary from me, no reflection, etc. Just a provocative or informative quote from a saint in church history.

Pink AW“The renewed heart is moved and melted when it contemplates the holy Savior having our iniquities imputed to Him and bearing our sins in His own body on the tree. But how rarely is it considered that it is little less wonderful for the Holy Spirit to exercise Himself with our sins and hold them up to the eyes of our understanding. Yet this is precisely what He does: He rakes in our foul hearts and makes us conscious of what a stench they are in the nostrils of an infinitely pure God. He brings to light and to sight the hidden and hideous things of darkness and convicts us of our vile and lost condition. He opens to our view the horrible pit in which by nature we lie, and makes us to realize that we deserve nothing but the everlasting burnings. O how truly marvelous that the Third Person of the Godhead should condescend to stoop to such a work as that!”

– A.W. Pink, in The Holy Spirit

Are Miraculous Gifts Still in Operation Today?

The Friday feature of the Worldly Saints blog has a NEW THEME. Fridays are going to be reserved for answering questions submitted to you (the reader of this blog). You can ask any question you would like, and it doesn’t have to be about a recent blog post. Any biblical or theological or historical or cultural question is encouraged.

Introductory Thoughts

I will do “my best” to present a case for what is called Cessationism. I say “my best” and not “absolute” because there are areas of dogmatism some go that we will not go because the Scripture is not dogmatic on every possible angle cessasionists take. Cessationism, I believe, is the best option but some godly men that we quote, refer to, and will continue to endorse do not agree with our position (e.g., John Piper, Wayne Grudem, C.J. Mahaney, D.A. Carson, etc.).

4 Main Views on the Topic of Miraculous Gifts

I want to give you a quick definition of the main views. When dealing with miraculous gifts, you have four options:

  1. Pentecostal View: teaches all gifts of the Spirit mentioned in the N.T. are intended for today, that Spirit baptism comes after conversion and should be sought by Christians and when Spirit baptism occurs, people will speak in tongues
  2. Charismatic View: teaches all gifts of the Spirit mentioned in the N.T. are intended for today, but the timing of Spirit baptism and tongues is debatable
  3. Cessationism View: teaches there are no miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit in operation today
  4. Open-but Cautious View: teaches miraculous gifts of the Spirit are for today but the modern practice in most Charismatic churches is neither genuine or desirable; sees these gifts as occasionally or rarely occurring and not regularly as you see in the majority of Charismatic or Pentecostal churches

4 Disclaimers

Now, we before we make the case for Cessationism and much of it will stem from the next few verses, I want to share four disclaimers and/or reminders that are important from all of us to keep in mind on the question of the Cessationism of miraculous gifts.

  1. God works different ways in different administrations. While God Himself doesn’t change, and His plans are never thwarted, He operates, guides and directs in different ways during different periods of biblical history (e.g., priests and sacrifices, Spirit’s indwelling in the N.T age).
  2. Cessationism doesn’t deny that God performs miracles. The question is not, “Can God perform miracles today?” but “Does God still use men to perform miracles?” Cessasionists believe in miracles. The most miraculous work of the Spirit is still at work today: conversion and God will do whatever he pleases (Ps 115:3). Samuel Waldron in To Be Continued? speaks for cessasionists – “I am not denying by all this that there are miracles in the world today in the broader sense of supernatural occurrences and extraordinary providences. I am only saying that there are no miracles in the stricter sense [of] miracle-workers performing miraculous signs to attest the redemptive revelation they bring from God. Though God has never locked Himself out of His world and is still at liberty to do as He pleases, when He pleases, how He pleases, and where He pleases, He has made it clear that the progress of redemptive revelation attested by miraculous signs done by miracle-workers has been brought to conclusion in the revelation embodied in our New Testaments.”[1]
  3. Cessationism is not an attack on the Person or work of the Holy Spirit. Some believe cessasionists are trying to limit the Holy Spirit or downplay his influence or importance by taking the miraculous gifts away. Cessasionists have the opposite goal in mind. Cessasionists don’t put the Spirit “in a box”; they say the Spirit put Himself there.
  4. Your view does not determine your salvation. Therefore, if someone wants to make a biblical case, allow it as long as they are not violation other parts of Scripture or hindering the Gospel.


Now, without further delay, here is why I believe Cessationism is the best view on the question of miraculous gifts.

  1. I Corinthians 13:8 – “As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.” The three gifts do not share the same verb that follows them. With “prophecy” and “knowledge”, we are told they “will pass away,” and with “tongues”, we are told they “will cease.” That is an important distinction. Without getting too technical here, the verb forms are not the same, which means you cannot assume the same thing is being communicated with each verb.The passing away appears in what is called the passive voice. What that means is that it will not just reach an ending point, but something will cause that end. In other words, “prophecy” and “knowledge” will reach an end based on something causing that ending (or cessation). What could cause the need for no more prophecy? How about a closed canon? How about the completed writings of sixty-six books?Tongues, on the other hand, are said to cease. And this verb form is different. We call this a middle voice. In the Greek, this verb form refers to something going on for a while and then just running out. It indicates that the object (“tongues”) has an intentional voluntary stopping place. Some translate this literally as “they shall make themselves cease or automatically cease of themselves.”[2] The best I can describe it is that it is like a battery with a limited power supply or lifespan. The idea is that once it has served its purpose, it will cease to exist. The gift of tongues was when God directly revealed something to the speaker that was then in need of translation; the completion of the canon makes that no longer necessary. Nothing causes it to stop; it ends on its own. Thus, whenever this gift was no longer needed, it would have ceased.Prophecies and knowledge will be stopped by something outside of themselves (or caused to stop); tongues will end by itself. Prophecy and knowledge are stopped by something coming; tongues stops when it is no longer useful.
  2. The purpose of the gift of tongues and the performing of miracles was to confirm the Word being spoken by the apostles to unbelievers. These miraculous gifts were their credentials, you could say. In II Corinthians 12:12, Paul tells this same church, “The signs of a true apostle were performed among you with utmost patience, with signs and wonders and mighty works.” And they were meant for the unbeliever – not the edification of the church.In the next chapter, Ch. 14, we hear Paul say, “21 In the Law it is written, ‘By people of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and even then they will not listen to me, says the Lord.’ 22 Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers.”In another letter in the N.T., we even read this starting comment – “How shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard, while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will” (Heb 2:3-4). Isn’t is curious that the author speaks in a past tense here? God used to do this, is what vs. 4 implies to show us this was not a current manifestation.Thus, if these gifts had a specific purpose that is no longer valid, these miraculous gifts have ceased.
  3. Ephesians 2:20 calls the apostolic age foundational but it is not permanent – The church was “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone.” Since there is no apostolic succession, any gift or feature an apostle would be given would “die off” with him.
  4. Miraculous gifts disappear inside the N.T. age. Why wouldn’t Paul, as he writes to Timothy, his pastoral protégé, when instructing him about all things relative to the church never mention miraculous gifts? If miraculous gifts were supposed to be practiced today, why not re-iterate them in the Great Commission? Or elder or deacon qualifications?
  5. Church history is silent on the practice of the miraculous gifts. No post-apostolic father mentions the practice or endorses miraculous gifts. The only early exception would be Montanus (2nd century), but he believed revelation continued through him and not the N.T. There is a long line of support in church history who taught that miraculous gifts ceased in the N.T. age with the apostles: R.L. Dabney, Charles Spurgeon, Abraham Kuyper, William G.T. Shedd, A.W. Pink, B.B. Warfield, John Chrysostom, St. Augustine, J.C. Ryle, Theodoret of Cyrus, Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Owen, Thomas Watson, Matthew Henry, John Gill, Jonathan Edwards, etc. I usually don’t want to stand on the other side from them on this issue if I can keep from it.
  6. Scripture is sufficient. Sufficiency means that Scripture is complete; it is enough. It doesn’t lack support or validation. When Jesus spoke, He often performed miracles to prove His person. When Peter preached on Pentecost, the Spirit brought tongues to validate His message. These occurrences came during a time when a written Bible didn’t exist and wasn’t available to all. Today, the Spirit speaks through His Word. Why would He choose to use subjective means to communicate objective truth?

This is why we would say that even the experiences or stories we hear of regarding the miraculous must be heard with caution. Rarely can they be verified and they are often misunderstood by witnesses. Experience is not the primary test of truth. It is important to keep in mind that anything can be counterfeited or misunderstood.

In conclusion, the miraculous gifts have, in my opinion, ceased.


If you have a question you would like to submit to our blog to be answered in the future, please send them to charlesheck@cox.net or ask them in the comments section of this post.


[1] To Be Continued?, pg. 102

[2] The New Linguistic and Exegetical Key to the Greek New Testament, pg. 380

J.D. Greear on the Filling of the Holy Spirit

The Sunday feature of the Worldly Saints blog is all about quotes. No commentary from me, no reflection, etc. Just a provocative or informative quote from a saint in church history.


Greear JD“If everything you do is explainable by natural giftings, then at your funeral people will likely give you credit for your accomplishments. But if God does things through you that are “impossible with me,” then at your funeral your friends are likely to give God the credit. The Spirit wants to glorify Jesus in your life, not you. Live today with your eulogy in mind, asking God to do through you what only he can get credit for. I want the summation of my life to be the words of Zechariah the prophet, “Not my might, nor by power, but by my Spirit,” says the Lord. (Zech 4:6) I’m yearning or the Holy Spirit to write a story through me that only his power can explain. I hope friends will summarize my life not as “the acts of J.D. Greear,” but “the Acts of the Holy Spirit … through and around J.D. Greear.” He’s writing the story of Jesus salvation project through me and following it as he unfolds it has become the great adventure of my life.”

– J.D. Greear in Jesus Continued

Martyn Lloyd Jones on the Spirit’s Elevation of the Son

The Friday feature of the Worldly Saints blog is all about quotes. No commentary from me, no reflection, etc. Just a provocative or informative quote from a saint in church history.


“The Spirit does not glorify Himself; He glorifies the Son. … This is, to me, one of the most amazing and remarkable things about the biblical doctrine of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit seems to hide Himself and to conceal Himself. He is always, as it were, putting focus on the Son, and that is why I believe, and I believe profoundly, that the best test of all as to whether we have received the Spirit is to ask ourselves, what do we think of, and what do we know about, the Son. Is the Son real to us? That is the work of the Spirit. He is glorified indirectly; He is always pointing us to the Son.”

  • Martyn Lloyd Jones in Great Doctrines of the Bible